JACK KIRBY: STORY TELLER
Wednesday, August 29, 2018
HAPPY (BELATED) 101st BIRTHDAY TO JACK KIRBY!
In honor of what would have been the 101st birthday of comic book writer/artist/legend Jack Kirby (who was born on the 28th of August, 1917 and passed away on the 6th of February, 1994), I highly recommend watching this excellent 2007 documentary....
Sunday, August 26, 2018
CHAMELEO ON THE SICK & WRONG PODCAST
"DO YOU HAVE ENOUGH SICK & WRONG IN YOUR LIFE?"
If your answer to that question is a definite "NO" (and I suspect that it is), I suggest listening to the 8-6-18 episode of THE SICK & WRONG PODCAST which features a lengthy interview with Yours Truly. This interview includes brand new, recently uncovered evidence in the ongoing CHAMELEO saga!
Also covered in this episode are such vital matters facing the world today as:
• the potential terror of an imminent ALF reboot;
• the deadly humor virus now affecting the Earth and its connections to my debut novel UNTIL THE LAST DOG DIES and the sudden Disney firing of James Gunn;
• the parallels between Bela Lugosi's MARK OF THE VAMPIRE and illegal CIA shenanigans in the Philippines;
• Jacques Vallee's MESSENGERS OF DECEPTION, Greg Bishop's PROJECT BETA, and faked alien abductions;
• the weird, destructive, and demonstrable side effects of Common Core;
• cryptozoology being used as a cover for American espionage operations in the Far East;
• and the recent drive-by shooting (on a bicycle) of George H. W. Bush's personal physician, Dr. Mark Hausknecht.
If you'd like to hear this entire episode of THE SICK & WRONG PODCAST, click HERE!
Wednesday, August 15, 2018
Update on the Death of Max Spiers
From Joe Mellor's 8-12-18 London Economic article entitled "Officers Investigating the Death of UFO Theorist Are Facing Disciplinary Proceedings, As Incident Continues To Be Unexplained":
Police investigating the death of a conspiracy theorist are facing disciplinary proceedings it has emerged, as the incident continues to be unexplained.
Max Bates-Spiers, from Kent, died suddenly in a house in Poland in 2016 – days before he was due to speak at a conference about conspiracy theories and UFOs.
The 39-year-old is said to have vomited black fluid shortly before his death. But Polish authorities initially recorded he had died from natural causes.
A second post-mortem examination when his body was returned to east Kent proved inconclusive.
And now a coroner in Canterbury has now revealed that Polish police are facing disciplinary action for their handling of the case.
Max’s inquest was originally opened in December 2016 and adjourned until last November. But coroner Alan Blundson said at the time that he did not have enough information to proceed with the full inquest.
At a pre-inquest review held at The Guildhall in Sandwich this week, Mr Blundson also heard there were discrepancies in accounts given by the emergency services at the time of Max’s death....
To read the rest of Mellor's article, click HERE.
Police investigating the death of a conspiracy theorist are facing disciplinary proceedings it has emerged, as the incident continues to be unexplained.
Max Bates-Spiers, from Kent, died suddenly in a house in Poland in 2016 – days before he was due to speak at a conference about conspiracy theories and UFOs.
The 39-year-old is said to have vomited black fluid shortly before his death. But Polish authorities initially recorded he had died from natural causes.
A second post-mortem examination when his body was returned to east Kent proved inconclusive.
And now a coroner in Canterbury has now revealed that Polish police are facing disciplinary action for their handling of the case.
Max’s inquest was originally opened in December 2016 and adjourned until last November. But coroner Alan Blundson said at the time that he did not have enough information to proceed with the full inquest.
At a pre-inquest review held at The Guildhall in Sandwich this week, Mr Blundson also heard there were discrepancies in accounts given by the emergency services at the time of Max’s death....
To read the rest of Mellor's article, click HERE.
Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Alan Moore on the 50th Anniversary of THE PRISONER
From David Bushman's 8-10-18 Paley Matters piece entitled "Alan Moore Remembers Patrick McGoohan's The Prisoner":
To read David Bushman's entire interview with Alan Moore, click HERE.
Arguably the most profound and influential writer in the history of comic books, Alan Moore has authored such seminal works as Watchmen (the sole graphic title on Time’s list of best novels since 1923), From Hell, V for Vendetta, and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, as well as the novels Voice of the Fire and Jerusalem and the epic poem The Mirror of Love (and so much more). The Guardian’s Steve Rose once dubbed him “the undisputed high priest of the medium, whose every word is seized upon like a message from the ether” by comics fans. Comics historian George Khoury said that calling Moore the best writer in the history of comics is an understatement.
Upshot: Moore is a genius.
Plus, he’s an ardent admirer of The Prisoner, the Delphic, genre-bending seventeen-episode British TV series cocreated by Patrick McGoohan, who also starred, as a former secret agent (McGoohan had previously starred as John Drake in Danger Man, or Secret Agent, as it was known in the U.S.) who, following his resignation, is abducted and whisked away to a mysterious coastal-village resort where people are known by numbers rather than names and aspiring escapees are subdued by militaristic balloon-like devices called Rovers. The Prisoner debuted in the U.K. in 1967, and in the U.S. (on CBS) the following year — so, fifty years ago. My, how time flies.
Many writers, producers, and directors revere this show, like Moore, including Christopher Nolan, Twin Peak’s Mark Frost, and X-Files creator Chris Carter, and have cited as influences on their own work; it has been toasted in countless films, television shows, songs, comics, and novels.
In commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary, the Paley Center reached out recently to Moore, who graciously agreed to respond to a list of questions submitted (and answered) via email. The Q+A follows....
To read David Bushman's entire interview with Alan Moore, click HERE.
Friday, August 10, 2018
Homeland Security's Photography Alert
From Jonathan Peters' 7-12-18 Columbia Journalism Review article entitled "Homeland Security Photography Alert Is 'A Seed of Fear'":
Photojournalists, beware: The US Department of Homeland Security has its eyes on you. The agency tweeted Monday: "Know the signs! Did you know photography and surveillance could be a sign of terrorism-related suspicious activity? If you notice this, be sure to report it to local authorities.#seesay #protectyoureveryday"
Such expansive language is problematic under the First Amendment. “When you look at what DHS identifies as the signs [and objects] of suspicious photography—‘personnel, facilities, security features, or infrastructure’—it basically leaves squirrels as the only thing that’s safe to photograph,” says Frank LoMonte, executive director of the University of Florida’s Brechner Center for Freedom of Information. “That’s a pretty breathtakingly broad inventory.”
LoMonte says a chilling effect often occurs when police show up and question a photographer for simply making pictures, even if no arrest or charges follow. “Being forced to justify why you’re outside of a federal building with a camera is intimidating,” he says.
A DHS spokesperson told me the tweet is part of the “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign, which is supposed to raise public awareness of terrorism indicators and the value of reporting suspicious activity to law enforcement. DHS launched the campaign in 2010, though its origins trace back to 9/11 [...].
Notably, the First Amendment prohibits government agents from taking any action intended to dissuade a person from exercising constitutionally protected rights, and generally that includes the taking of photos in public spaces for journalistic and other purposes.
“One of the real problems with this ongoing campaign,” says Mickey Osterreicher, the general counsel of the National Press Photographers Association, “is that by listing [photography] in a leading way as an example of suspicious activity, rather than just requesting citizens to report suspicious activities, [DHS is] planting a seed of fear and suspicion about otherwise innocuous behavior” [...].
“I’d be real curious to see the research telling us that terrorists are prone to stand on public sidewalks conspicuously filming their intended targets ‘in a prolonged manner,’” LoMonte says. “This just seems like an invitation for people who don’t like journalists to sic the cops on them.”
To read Peters' article in its entirety, click HERE.
Photojournalists, beware: The US Department of Homeland Security has its eyes on you. The agency tweeted Monday: "Know the signs! Did you know photography and surveillance could be a sign of terrorism-related suspicious activity? If you notice this, be sure to report it to local authorities.
Such expansive language is problematic under the First Amendment. “When you look at what DHS identifies as the signs [and objects] of suspicious photography—‘personnel, facilities, security features, or infrastructure’—it basically leaves squirrels as the only thing that’s safe to photograph,” says Frank LoMonte, executive director of the University of Florida’s Brechner Center for Freedom of Information. “That’s a pretty breathtakingly broad inventory.”
LoMonte says a chilling effect often occurs when police show up and question a photographer for simply making pictures, even if no arrest or charges follow. “Being forced to justify why you’re outside of a federal building with a camera is intimidating,” he says.
A DHS spokesperson told me the tweet is part of the “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign, which is supposed to raise public awareness of terrorism indicators and the value of reporting suspicious activity to law enforcement. DHS launched the campaign in 2010, though its origins trace back to 9/11 [...].
Notably, the First Amendment prohibits government agents from taking any action intended to dissuade a person from exercising constitutionally protected rights, and generally that includes the taking of photos in public spaces for journalistic and other purposes.
“One of the real problems with this ongoing campaign,” says Mickey Osterreicher, the general counsel of the National Press Photographers Association, “is that by listing [photography] in a leading way as an example of suspicious activity, rather than just requesting citizens to report suspicious activities, [DHS is] planting a seed of fear and suspicion about otherwise innocuous behavior” [...].
“I’d be real curious to see the research telling us that terrorists are prone to stand on public sidewalks conspicuously filming their intended targets ‘in a prolonged manner,’” LoMonte says. “This just seems like an invitation for people who don’t like journalists to sic the cops on them.”
To read Peters' article in its entirety, click HERE.
Cinema and Surveillance
From Nick Pinkerton's 7-2-18 Baffler article entitled "A Thousand Unblinking Eyes: A History--Cinema and Surveillance from Fritz Lang to Michael Mann":
There is a moment in the 1960 Fritz Lang film The Thousand Eyes of Dr. Mabuse which, even though it has since been seen in countless subsequent variations, seems jarring in its newness. A couple, played by Peter van Eyck and Dawn Addams, sit talking at a table adjacent to the ballroom floor in Berlin’s swank Luxor Hotel. They’re filmed in a two-shot discussing her troubled mindset, her unhappy marriage, and the possibility of a divorce from her beastly husband. We may notice that the quality of the image in this setup is unusually murky before Lang’s camera pulls back to reveal that we are looking at a frame within a frame, and that our protagonists are being captured by a surveillance camera and observed by an unseen figure in a control room whose location is unknown. As soon as this sinister information has registered, we leave behind the monitor on a cut that returns to the Luxor Hotel itself. “You see,” says Addams’s character, referring to her date’s unsettled frame of mind but suggesting much else, “You can’t just switch off either.”
This sudden encroachment by an observer, underlining the voyeuristic nature of the cinematic illusion (by crossing through the media of observation), had appeared in films before: What is the Wicked Witch of the West’s crystal ball in The Wizard of Oz (1939) but a prototypical surveillance device? In how many Westerns and adventure movies has matte shot masking been used to create the illusion of the view from a pair of binoculars, traversing a vast distance? Film had been a consciously scopophilic medium since the days of keyhole spying in early cinema works such as Ferdinand Zecca’s What Happened to the Inquisitive Janitor (1901), but movies like Michael Powell’s Peeping Tom (1960) and its contemporary, The Thousand Eyes of Dr. Mabuse responded to a new eruption of technology-driven voyeurism in the real world—pornographic permissiveness in Powell’s film, and the state-sponsored surveillance apparatus in Lang’s.
Lang himself had shown the ownership caste using audiovisual oversight to keep tabs on the working classes in his Metropolis (1927), an idea that Chaplin would appropriate for comic fodder in his Modern Times (1936). These futuristic examples aside, the realistic, practically functional moving-image surveillance camera had appeared in several movies before The Thousand Eyes of Dr. Mabuse. Henry Hathaway, a director more than usually attentive to cutting-edge tech in his semi-documentary-style thrillers—he gives meaty supporting roles to the Linotype, lie detector, and wire photo transfer machine in his Call Northside 777 (1948)—shows the use of hidden microphones and motion picture cameras positioned behind two-way mirrors in his The House on 92nd Street (1945), here working to capture and eventually incriminate Nazis.
What is different about the spy setup at the Luxor, and what distinguishes it from any of these earlier examples, based either in speculative fantasy or fact, is that it is distinctly a then-still-new closed-circuit television (CCTV) device, or video surveillance system, a technological development that many worried would make real the possibility of the Orwellian security apparatus. If it is not the first appearance of an extensive CCTV system in a contemporary-set, non-science-fiction feature film, it is the first that I know of, though in subsequent years they would appear with increasing regularity—Joseph Losey’s These Are the Damned (1962) imagines an almost literal nanny state, in which a CCTV-type system is used to educate a new race of irradiated, A-bomb invulnerable children from afar....
To read the rest of Pinkerton's article, click HERE.
There is a moment in the 1960 Fritz Lang film The Thousand Eyes of Dr. Mabuse which, even though it has since been seen in countless subsequent variations, seems jarring in its newness. A couple, played by Peter van Eyck and Dawn Addams, sit talking at a table adjacent to the ballroom floor in Berlin’s swank Luxor Hotel. They’re filmed in a two-shot discussing her troubled mindset, her unhappy marriage, and the possibility of a divorce from her beastly husband. We may notice that the quality of the image in this setup is unusually murky before Lang’s camera pulls back to reveal that we are looking at a frame within a frame, and that our protagonists are being captured by a surveillance camera and observed by an unseen figure in a control room whose location is unknown. As soon as this sinister information has registered, we leave behind the monitor on a cut that returns to the Luxor Hotel itself. “You see,” says Addams’s character, referring to her date’s unsettled frame of mind but suggesting much else, “You can’t just switch off either.”
This sudden encroachment by an observer, underlining the voyeuristic nature of the cinematic illusion (by crossing through the media of observation), had appeared in films before: What is the Wicked Witch of the West’s crystal ball in The Wizard of Oz (1939) but a prototypical surveillance device? In how many Westerns and adventure movies has matte shot masking been used to create the illusion of the view from a pair of binoculars, traversing a vast distance? Film had been a consciously scopophilic medium since the days of keyhole spying in early cinema works such as Ferdinand Zecca’s What Happened to the Inquisitive Janitor (1901), but movies like Michael Powell’s Peeping Tom (1960) and its contemporary, The Thousand Eyes of Dr. Mabuse responded to a new eruption of technology-driven voyeurism in the real world—pornographic permissiveness in Powell’s film, and the state-sponsored surveillance apparatus in Lang’s.
Lang himself had shown the ownership caste using audiovisual oversight to keep tabs on the working classes in his Metropolis (1927), an idea that Chaplin would appropriate for comic fodder in his Modern Times (1936). These futuristic examples aside, the realistic, practically functional moving-image surveillance camera had appeared in several movies before The Thousand Eyes of Dr. Mabuse. Henry Hathaway, a director more than usually attentive to cutting-edge tech in his semi-documentary-style thrillers—he gives meaty supporting roles to the Linotype, lie detector, and wire photo transfer machine in his Call Northside 777 (1948)—shows the use of hidden microphones and motion picture cameras positioned behind two-way mirrors in his The House on 92nd Street (1945), here working to capture and eventually incriminate Nazis.
What is different about the spy setup at the Luxor, and what distinguishes it from any of these earlier examples, based either in speculative fantasy or fact, is that it is distinctly a then-still-new closed-circuit television (CCTV) device, or video surveillance system, a technological development that many worried would make real the possibility of the Orwellian security apparatus. If it is not the first appearance of an extensive CCTV system in a contemporary-set, non-science-fiction feature film, it is the first that I know of, though in subsequent years they would appear with increasing regularity—Joseph Losey’s These Are the Damned (1962) imagines an almost literal nanny state, in which a CCTV-type system is used to educate a new race of irradiated, A-bomb invulnerable children from afar....
To read the rest of Pinkerton's article, click HERE.
Neural Interfaces Connect Warfighters Directly to Computers
From John Keller's 3-26-18 Military & Aerospace Electronics article entitled "DARPA Eyes New Neural Interfaces to Connect Warfighters Hands-free to Advanced Military Systems":
U.S. military researchers are asking for industry's help in developing non-invasive or minimally invasive neural interfaces to connect warfighters directly to computers or other digital devices to enable fast, effective, and intuitive hands-free interaction with military systems.
Officials of the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in Arlington, Va., issued a presolicitation Friday (HR001118S0029) for the Next-Generation Non-Surgical Neurotechnology (N3) project to develop a nonsurgical neural interface system to broaden the applicability of neural interfaces to the able-bodied warfighter.
Until now, neural interfaces that connect human brains to computers and other digital equipment have been surgically invasive and used primarily to help restore functions and skills to injured warfighters. The N3 project, however, seeks to enable neural recording and stimulation with sub-millimeter spatial resolution in healthy warfighters.
Neural interfaces could enable warfighters to multitask more efficiently, and interact with autonomous and semi-autonomous systems -- particularly future systems equipped with artificial intelligence (AI), researchers say.
The problem with human-machine neural interfaces today is how surgically invasive they are. State-of-the-art high-resolution single-neuron or neural-ensemble neural interfaces are invasive, and require surgical implantation of metal or silicon-based electrodes into brain tissue or on the surface of the brain [...].
Non invasive interfaces will involve sensors and stimulators that do not breach the skin. Minutely invasive approaches, meanwhile, will permit nonsurgical delivery of a nanotransducer delivered to neurons of interest.
Transducers should be small enough so as not to cause tissue damage or impede the natural neuronal circuit, and will be external to the skull. Non invasive and minutely invasive approaches will be necessary to overcome issues with signal scattering, attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio [...].
The N3 program will provide as long as four years of funding to deliver a nonsurgical neural interface system and is divided into three sequential phases: a one-year base effort, and two 18-month option periods.
Proposers must use approaches that ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability (also known as the CIA triad) to prevent spoofing, tampering, or denial of service. It will be necessary to secure connections among the integrated device, the processing unit, and the system user’s brain.
To read the entire article, click HERE.
U.S. military researchers are asking for industry's help in developing non-invasive or minimally invasive neural interfaces to connect warfighters directly to computers or other digital devices to enable fast, effective, and intuitive hands-free interaction with military systems.
Officials of the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in Arlington, Va., issued a presolicitation Friday (HR001118S0029) for the Next-Generation Non-Surgical Neurotechnology (N3) project to develop a nonsurgical neural interface system to broaden the applicability of neural interfaces to the able-bodied warfighter.
Until now, neural interfaces that connect human brains to computers and other digital equipment have been surgically invasive and used primarily to help restore functions and skills to injured warfighters. The N3 project, however, seeks to enable neural recording and stimulation with sub-millimeter spatial resolution in healthy warfighters.
Neural interfaces could enable warfighters to multitask more efficiently, and interact with autonomous and semi-autonomous systems -- particularly future systems equipped with artificial intelligence (AI), researchers say.
The problem with human-machine neural interfaces today is how surgically invasive they are. State-of-the-art high-resolution single-neuron or neural-ensemble neural interfaces are invasive, and require surgical implantation of metal or silicon-based electrodes into brain tissue or on the surface of the brain [...].
Non invasive interfaces will involve sensors and stimulators that do not breach the skin. Minutely invasive approaches, meanwhile, will permit nonsurgical delivery of a nanotransducer delivered to neurons of interest.
Transducers should be small enough so as not to cause tissue damage or impede the natural neuronal circuit, and will be external to the skull. Non invasive and minutely invasive approaches will be necessary to overcome issues with signal scattering, attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio [...].
The N3 program will provide as long as four years of funding to deliver a nonsurgical neural interface system and is divided into three sequential phases: a one-year base effort, and two 18-month option periods.
Proposers must use approaches that ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability (also known as the CIA triad) to prevent spoofing, tampering, or denial of service. It will be necessary to secure connections among the integrated device, the processing unit, and the system user’s brain.
To read the entire article, click HERE.
The Nation's First Data Broker Regulation
From World Privacy Forum (5-24-18):
Historic Data Broker Regulation in the United States Welcomed by World Privacy Forum
The World Privacy Forum have campaigned tirelessly over the last seven years to bring attention to the vulnerabilities and gaps in consumer protection law in relation to data brokers. Pam Dixon, founder of the organisation, who has provided several testimonies to the US Congress, including the US Senate Commerce Committee, believes this overdue legislation will go a long way to protecting consumers from often unscrupulous practices.
“I’ve seen first-hand the profound harms data brokers can create in peoples’ lives, and this legislation is the first of its kind in the nation to respond to the problem,” said World Privacy Forum Executive Director Pam Dixon.
“The legislation provides new protections for consumers and is a historically important piece of privacy legislation.”
The new law provides important new consumer protections:
Historic Data Broker Regulation in the United States Welcomed by World Privacy Forum
- Vermont: First state to adopt modern rules for unregulated data brokers
- WPF call for data broker protections to be elevated to national level and provided for consumers in all states in the US
The World Privacy Forum have campaigned tirelessly over the last seven years to bring attention to the vulnerabilities and gaps in consumer protection law in relation to data brokers. Pam Dixon, founder of the organisation, who has provided several testimonies to the US Congress, including the US Senate Commerce Committee, believes this overdue legislation will go a long way to protecting consumers from often unscrupulous practices.
“I’ve seen first-hand the profound harms data brokers can create in peoples’ lives, and this legislation is the first of its kind in the nation to respond to the problem,” said World Privacy Forum Executive Director Pam Dixon.
“The legislation provides new protections for consumers and is a historically important piece of privacy legislation.”
The new law provides important new consumer protections:
- Data brokers will be required to register in the state of Vermont
- The law expressly prohibits the acquisition of personal information with the intent to commit wrongful acts such as stalking, harassment, fraud, identity theft, or discrimination [emphasis added]
Thursday, August 9, 2018
The Pentagon Can't Account for 21 Trillion
From Lee Camp's 5-14-18 Truthdig article entitled "The Pentagon Can't Account for 21 Trillion (That's Not a Typo)":
A couple of years ago, Mark Skidmore, an economics professor, heard Catherine Austin Fitts, former assistant secretary in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, say that the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General had found $6.5 trillion worth of unaccounted-for spending in 2015. Skidmore, being an economics professor, thought something like, “She means $6.5 billion. Not trillion. Because trillion would mean the Pentagon couldn’t account for more money than the gross domestic product of the whole United Kingdom. But still, $6.5 billion of unaccounted-for money is a crazy amount.”
So he went and looked at the inspector general’s report, and he found something interesting: It was trillion [...].
Skidmore did a little more digging. As Forbes reported in December 2017, “[He] and Catherine Austin Fitts … conducted a search of government websites and found similar reports dating back to 1998. While the documents are incomplete, original government sources indicate $21 trillion in unsupported adjustments have been reported for the Department of Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the years 1998-2015.”
To read the rest of Camp's article, click HERE.
A couple of years ago, Mark Skidmore, an economics professor, heard Catherine Austin Fitts, former assistant secretary in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, say that the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General had found $6.5 trillion worth of unaccounted-for spending in 2015. Skidmore, being an economics professor, thought something like, “She means $6.5 billion. Not trillion. Because trillion would mean the Pentagon couldn’t account for more money than the gross domestic product of the whole United Kingdom. But still, $6.5 billion of unaccounted-for money is a crazy amount.”
So he went and looked at the inspector general’s report, and he found something interesting: It was trillion [...].
Skidmore did a little more digging. As Forbes reported in December 2017, “[He] and Catherine Austin Fitts … conducted a search of government websites and found similar reports dating back to 1998. While the documents are incomplete, original government sources indicate $21 trillion in unsupported adjustments have been reported for the Department of Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the years 1998-2015.”
To read the rest of Camp's article, click HERE.
Experimentation On Indigenous People
From Ashifa Kassam's 5-11-18 Guardian article entitled "Canada Sued Over Years of Alleged Experimentation On Indigenous People":
A class action lawsuit has been filed in a Canadian court on behalf of the thousands of indigenous people alleged to have been unwittingly subjected to medical experiments without their consent.
Filed this month in a courtroom in the province of Saskatchewan, the lawsuit holds the federal government responsible for experiments allegedly carried out on reserves and in residential schools between the 1930s and 1950s.
The suit also accuses the Canadian government of a long history of “discriminatory and inadequate medical care” at Indian hospitals and sanatoriums – key components of a segregated healthcare system that operated across the country from 1945 into the early 1980s.
“This strikes me as so atrocious that there ought to be punitive and exemplary damages awarded, in addition to compensation,” said Tony Merchant, whose Merchant Law Group filed the class action.
The lawsuit, which has not yet been tested in court, alleges that residential schools – where more than 150,000 aboriginal children were carted off in an attempt to forcibly assimilate them into Canadian society – were used as sites for nutritional experiments, where researchers tested out their theories about vitamins and certain foods.
“The wrong here is that nobody knew it was happening. Their families didn’t know it was happening,” Merchant said.
To read the rest of Kassam's article, click HERE.
A class action lawsuit has been filed in a Canadian court on behalf of the thousands of indigenous people alleged to have been unwittingly subjected to medical experiments without their consent.
Filed this month in a courtroom in the province of Saskatchewan, the lawsuit holds the federal government responsible for experiments allegedly carried out on reserves and in residential schools between the 1930s and 1950s.
The suit also accuses the Canadian government of a long history of “discriminatory and inadequate medical care” at Indian hospitals and sanatoriums – key components of a segregated healthcare system that operated across the country from 1945 into the early 1980s.
“This strikes me as so atrocious that there ought to be punitive and exemplary damages awarded, in addition to compensation,” said Tony Merchant, whose Merchant Law Group filed the class action.
The lawsuit, which has not yet been tested in court, alleges that residential schools – where more than 150,000 aboriginal children were carted off in an attempt to forcibly assimilate them into Canadian society – were used as sites for nutritional experiments, where researchers tested out their theories about vitamins and certain foods.
“The wrong here is that nobody knew it was happening. Their families didn’t know it was happening,” Merchant said.
To read the rest of Kassam's article, click HERE.
Tuesday, August 7, 2018
"The Vorpal Report" in The Temz Review
My new novelette "The Vorpal Report" (9,400 words) has just been published in the latest issue of The Temz Review. A special preview of the novelette follows:
The Vorpal Report
by Robert Guffey
Sunday
What’s
wrong? she seemed to ask, tracing his bare back with her fingertip.
He
shrugged his shoulders in response.
She
sighed with ennui, then slid her palms down his back and began kissing him
along his spine.
He
stared at the blanket that hung from the top of the bunk bed above them.
Her
roommate was gone. Most everyone in the dorm was gone … for Thanksgiving
weekend, he assumed. Thanksgiving, he’d always suspected secretly, was like
most holidays: a con to keep you in your home, stuffing your face with dead
meat all day while government agents in “Radiation Suit Leisure Wear” tiptoe in
your backyard, injecting your flower garden with a new chemical virus created
by Mengele’s ghost up in that condo lab in D.C. with the plush red curtains.
Mmmm.
Yes.
Pherrod
Hempley now expressed this long-repressed suspicion to Ellen as he watched the
blanket hanging there from the top bunk. The ratty old blanket seemed to be clinging
on to dear life, doing nothing spectacular really—like himself.
Ellen
laughed. She leaned towards his ear, her long, recently fuchsia-dyed (cinnamon-scented)
hair falling onto his head. She ground her teeth lightly on the tiny white
hairs on his neck, and then on his flesh. How’re you doing? she asked.
Pherrod
wasn’t sure what to say, so he didn’t say anything.
Roll
over, she said softly, giggling, and pinched his butt.
His
gaze dropped from the blanket hanging from the mattress above him, to the
wad (Ellen’s blanket rolled up into a
ball at the foot of the bed) next to his mouth. Please don’t wipe it off on my
blanket, she said. One guy—some guy—did that. Real, uh … here, use this. Real
disgusting.
When
he wouldn’t roll over, she began attempting various ways to excite him. He lay
there for a few seconds, watching the blanket slide off the mattress above him,
then grabbed her arm and pulled her towards him. He began massaging her pink nipple,
and he looked her in the eyes and said, Nothing’s wrong. He kissed her on the
lips.
Mn. She
shook her head. No kissing.
So
he buried his head in the crook of her neck and shoulder and went at her with
four fingers.
His
face was pressed into her new hair for the twelfth time that day, and for the
life of him … he really couldn’t smell the cinnamon. Maybe it was just him.
But
when she asked him about it later, he nodded, and said, Yeah, baby, smells nice
….
She
grinned with satisfaction.
* * *
He
tried not to think of these things, but as he watched the lump of blanket
squatting next to his—and Ellen’s—head, he thought he could just as easily
imagine himself taking her skull and ramming it into the nightclub-flyer-covered
plaster of the wall four or five or six, perhaps more, several more, times … as he could taking her head in his hands and
covering it with kisses, as he did now after stealing one of her roommate’s
condoms that had been hidden underneath the mattress above them. The roommate
was going to be surprised when she came home; her supply was dwindling rapidly.
But Ellen said not to worry, she’d pay the stupid cunt back later.
Pherrod
found himself wondering how she would pay her back.
I’m
not paranoid, it’s just that I think everyone’s out to get me, an acquaintance
who thought of himself as a friend had said to him a long time ago, why?, no
one knows. But he found it funny now, as he came inside of her, and she held
on, and she siiiighed underneath him, and, hhhhhhh.
He
tried not to think of these things … of what she was doing (and who she was
doing it with) when he wasn’t around.
But
he often did.
* * *
Thanksgiving
dinners. Holidays. Celebratory toasts.
What
these things are, exactly, are cons to keep people in their homes stuffing
their faces with dead meat all day while ….
* * *
A
government agent flew in through the window and—straddling his broom—landed
like a rocket ship in the bathroom. It was dark. But he didn’t need a light. Infrared
goggles had long been standard issue. All he needed to do was plant the vector,
then take off …
This
he did, in the false bottom of the medicine cabinet (which had been installed long
ago for just this reason) …
Quietly,
he reclosed the cabinet.
Quietly,
he straddled his broom once more.
And
quietly, he kicked off from the second story bathroom window sill, and with a
quiet, carbine backfire, was gone into the quiet, suburban night.
Quietly.
* *
*
Jabberwocky
Outbreak Declared a Pandemic by CDC
Washington,
D.C.—Over the past few weeks dozens of cities on the East Coast of the United
States have become affected by an illness the Center for Disease Control is
calling “Jabberwocky Disease,” a disorder that affects only the language
centers of the brain. With the advent of the illness, common words are often
transformed into meaningless utterances, though the victims themselves appear
not to be aware of this. The victims are not affected otherwise, and the
disease is not believed to be fatal.
“The
breakdown this could cause in our day-to-day lives is incalculable,” says Dr.
Ronald Eckert of the CDC. “Up till now, in the vast majority of instances, the
deleterious effects have been gradual and intermittent; however, in rare but
severe cases, the language breakdown has been abrupt and resistant to treatment.
In the past few days, these severe cases have begun to multiply exponentially. Unfortunately,
the disorder appears to affect not only oral communication, but written
communication as well.” Dr. Eckert
claims that the outbreak, within only a few days, has reached pandemic
proportions.
According
to Dr. Amini Fayshad, former U.S. Surgeon General, the possibilities of this
disease are far more dire than one might imagine. “What adds to the general
uncertainty of the situation is the fact that no reputable linguist is aware of
what might occur to the way people perceive reality if the means by which human
beings communicate undergoes a sudden and irreversible paradigm shift,”
commented Dr. Fayshad on Sunday. “What if reality itself is shaped by the
language we use to describe it?”
The War Against the Imagination (Update)
Here are some relevant excerpts from Grace Schulman's 8-6-18 New York Times Opinion piece entitled "The Nation Magazine Betrays a Poet--and Itself":
During the 35 years that I edited poetry for The Nation magazine, we published the likes of W.S. Merwin,
Pablo Neruda, May Swenson, Denise Levertov, James Merrill and Derek
Walcott. They wrote on subjects as varied as lesbian passion and nuclear
threats. Some poems, and some critical views, enraged our readers and
drove them to drop their subscriptions.
But
never did we apologize for a poem we published. We saw it as part of
our job to provoke our readers — a mission we took especially seriously
in serving the magazine’s absolute devotion to a free press [...].
Apparently the magazine has abandoned this storied tradition.
Last month, the magazine published a poem by Anders Carlson-Wee. The poet is white. His poem, “How-To,” draws on black vernacular.
Following a vicious backlash against the poem on social media, the poetry editors, Stephanie Burt and Carmen Giménez Smith, apologized for publishing it in the first place: “We made a serious mistake by choosing to publish the poem ‘How-To.’ We are sorry for the pain we have caused to the many communities affected by this poem,” they wrote in an apology longer than the actual poem. The poet apologized, too, saying, “I am sorry for the pain I caused” [...].
How far we have come from those idealistic, courageous days. As Katha Pollitt, a columnist for The Nation, put it, the magazine’s apology for Mr. Carlson-Wee’s work was “craven” and “looks like a letter from re-education camp.”
The
broader issue here, though, is the backward and increasingly prevalent
idea that the artist is somehow morally responsible for his character’s
behavior or voice. Writers have always presented characters with
unwholesome views; F. Scott Fitzgerald, Charles Dickens and Shakespeare
come immediately to mind. One wonders if editors would have the courage to publish Robert Lowell’s “Words for Hart Crane” or Ezra Pound’s “Sestina: Altaforte” today.
To read Schulman's entire piece, click HERE.