"Ladies and gentlemen of the Board, I am here to give a report on preliminary experiments with Virus B-23.... Consider the origins of this virus in the Cities of the Red Night. The red glow that covered the northern sky at night was a form of radiation that gave rise to a plague known as the Red Fever, of which Virus B-23 was found to be etiological agent."
--William S. Burroughs, Cities of the Red Night (1981), p. 20
Although
the the U.S. intelligence community early on dismissed the notion that
the coronavirus is a synthesized bioweapon, it is still weighing the
possibility that the pandemic might have been touched off by an accident
at a research facility rather than by an infection from a live-animal
market, according to nine current and former intelligence and national
security officials familiar with ongoing investigations.
After
extensive research, scientists in the U.S. and elsewhere have
determined that the new strain of the coronavirus discovered in China in
December is, as Chinese officials have maintained, of natural origin,
but they are taking seriously that its route to human infection may have
started in a lab in Wuhan.
“It’s
definitely a real possibility being bandied about at the high levels of
the administration,” said one of the sources, who has knowledge of
China and national security [...].
The
possibility that the pandemic originated in a lab was first discussed
publicly in mid-February as China hawks and Trump allies began to push
the bioweapon angle. The New York Times reported that
the main proponent of the lab accident theory is President Trump’s
deputy national security adviser, Matthew Pottinger, a former Wall
Street Journal reporter in China with a reputation for hawkish views on
Beijing. Pottinger, through an NSC spokesperson, declined to comment.
Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas publicly promoted a
range of theories, including that the virus could have been a
“deliberate release” or an “engineered bioweapon” that was accidentally
leaked. However, Cotton, who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee,
also noted that the culprit could have been “good science, bad safety”
or a mistake made in the course of honest research on “diagnostic
testing or vaccines.”
Current
and former intelligence officials familiar with internal briefings
declined to provide details but noted the lab accident theory being
promoted by Cotton may not be so crazy. “Tom Cotton is presenting some
useful stuff there,” said one recently retired intelligence official
when asked about the theory [...].
Sources
declined to discuss any evidence, if it exists, that points to a
potential lab accident, but the intelligence community is not ruling it
out.
“Absent
a credible whistleblower or verified primary communication intercept,
it will not be possible to prove the origins with certainty,” said
[David] Relman, the Stanford microbiologist. “However, with more relevant data,
the likelihood of a natural virus versus accidental origin can be
strengthened or diminished.”
One
former senior CIA official said that if the virus did originate from a
Chinese research institution, the U.S. intelligence community will
eventually be able to prove it. “There will be disaffected Chinese
sources,” the former official said.
“Disasters
are good for us,” the former CIA official continued. “The crappier the
regime, the better it is to recruit sources there.”
To read the entire article, click HERE. From Adam Payne's 4-6-20 Business Insider article entitled "Boris Johnson's Government Has Considered the Possibility that the Coronavirus May Have Accidentally Leaked from a Chinese Lab":
The
UK government believes the novel coronavirus may have accidentally
leaked from a laboratory in the Chinese city of Wuhan where scientists
were researching viruses, according to a Mail on Sunday newspaper report.
Most
experts believe the outbreak of the virus began with animals passing
the disease to humans in or near a market in the Chinese city of Wuhan
where live animals were sold.
The
Mail on Sunday report, however, says that while officials in Prime
Minister Boris Johnson's government believe this is still the most
likely explanation, it is "no longer being discounted" that a leak from a
nearby laboratory actually caused the outbreak.
"There
is a credible alternative view [to the zoonotic theory] based on the
nature of the virus," a member of the UK government's emergency
committee of senior officials, Cobra, told the newspaper. "Perhaps it is
no coincidence that there is that laboratory in Wuhan. It is not
discounted."
To read the entire article, click HERE.
No comments:
Post a Comment