The
Authors Guild objects to publishers’ new and increasing use of
so-called “morals clauses.” These contract provisions allow publishers
to terminate a book contract, and in many cases even require the author
to repay portions of the advance already received, if the author is
accused of immoral, illegal, or publicly condemned behavior. Publishers
insist they need the clauses to protect themselves in the event an
author’s reputation becomes so tarnished after the book contract is
signed that it will hurt sales. But most of these clauses are too broad
and allow a publisher to terminate based on individual accusations or
the vague notion of “public condemnation”—which can occur all too easily
in these days of viral social media.
The
ambiguity and subjectivity of these clauses make them ripe for abuse.
Publishers should not have the sole discretion to decide whether
accusations are true. And, if the accusations are not true, they should
not subject the author to termination. Publishing houses should perform
due diligence and determine whether the book and its author fit their
objectives before entering
into agreements. Broad morals clauses give publishers yet another
unfair way out of a contract when they decide they don’t want to publish
a book for whatever reason.
The
moral conduct of an author is not germane to the author’s fulfillment
of obligations under the contract; nor should it be a basis for
termination, much less returning the advance. The author’s side of the
bargain is to deliver the book promised in a timely manner, not to
uphold any unspecified standards of behavior.
What
constitutes behavior “subject to widespread public condemnation,”
“moral turpitude,” or similar terms used in these clauses varies widely
and often has as much to do with a nation’s current sociopolitical
climate as it does with ethics. As playwright Lillian Hellman notably
wrote in response to a subpoena to testify before the House Un-American
Activities Committee, which was investigating Communist infiltratration
of Hollywood and other American institutions, “I cannot and will not cut
my conscience to fit this year’s fashions.”
To read the entire article, click HERE.
No comments:
Post a Comment