Plausible deniability, so in vogue during the Watergate era, has now been supplanted by total deniability.
How was this accomplished? The answer is so obvious one wonders why it
took so long for the Cryptocratic Bad Brains to implement it on a mass
scale: Make sure these violations of the
law are not committed by any current member of a police organization or
intelligence agency. The field
work—involving active harassment, spying, psychological warfare, and physical
torture from a distance—is farmed out to eager civilians, some of whom may not
even be paid for the privilege of stalking their fellow citizens. In fact, there’s some evidence to suggest
that many of these civilians actually pay
others in order to be trained in these techniques.
Since my book Chameleo was published, specific information has come to the fore
about who these gangstalkers really are.
Official police organizations and intelligence agencies are forbidden
from tormenting people they “suspect” are guilty. In our glorious post-9/11 society, these
watchdogs of ethical purity have conjured up a rather circuitous route by which
to enact their vengeance against those who they believe are rotting away at the
moral structure of modern society. They
use civilian organizations—those that have been founded by former members of
the law enforcement and/or intelligence communities—to attack these
“suspicious” types by proxy. According
to a very well-respected Constitutional lawyer (whose identity must remain
anonymous for the time being), one such organization is the LEIU, the Law
Enforcement Intelligence Units.
No doubt, the vast majority of you have never heard of the LEIU, and yet this is by no means a covert organization. It's quite a trick to hide in plain sight, a trick made famous over one hundred and seventy years ago by none other than Edgar Allan Poe. Poe taught us all a valuable lesson in 1844 when he wrote his classic short story, “The Purloined Letter,” featuring the world’s very first literary detective, C. Auguste Dupin. In “The Purloined Letter” Dupin is recruited by the French police to locate a stolen letter, the contents of which might reflect unfavorably upon the royal family. The police have torn apart the thief’s apartment in search of this letter and have come up empty-handed. Out of desperation the police approach Dupin, who makes a great display of showing off his superior intellect by immediately pointing out the obvious: The thief, a man known only as Minister D--, never hid the letter at all. He simply placed it on the letter holder on the mantelpiece. The object of their quest had been staring the police in the face the entire time.
Jim Steinmeyer, a world-renowned expert
in the history of stage magic, offers a similar perspective in his celebrated
chronicle of the illusionist’s art, Hiding the Elephant: How Magicians Invented the Impossible and Learned to Disappear:
[T]here’s
a long, important tradition of magic being recorded and published. As my good friend Jay Marshall, the man
behind the counter at the magic shop, has said for many years: “If you want to keep something a secret,
publish it.” Once in print, information
is often filed, forgotten, or dismissed.
Publishing a secret takes away its cachet and causes it to be
overlooked. (xx)
Let’s pause a moment and kick off our
Dupin-like investigation at the most obvious starting point of all. Like the purloined letter sitting out in the
open on Minister D--’s mantel, the LEIU maintains a public website, which
describes the organization as follows:
In
1956, the Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Units (LEIU) was founded
to facilitate the sharing of confidential criminal information between law
enforcement agencies. Over the ensuing
decades, LEIU has expanded its role by providing professional training for
criminal intelligence practitioners and analysts while setting nationally
accepted criminal intelligence standards.
Today, with 200 member agencies and a voice at the national level,
LEIU’s mission is to provide leadership and promote professionalism in the
criminal intelligence community in order to protect public safety and
constitutional rights.
This requires some amount of
reinterpretation. What they mean is that
they intend to protect the constitutional rights of their friends and relatives
and cronies in the intelligence community and to hell with everyone else,
particularly if “everyone else” are commie-pinko-symps who engage in peaceful
civil disobedience against a government sliding rapidly into outright fascism. According to my source (the aforementioned
Constitutional lawyer), this is precisely what occurred to the Clamshell
Alliance in New England. The attorney
hired to defend the unconstitutional actions of the aforementioned atomic power
plant casually confided in the Alliance’s attorney that a “vigilante group”
named the LEIU had been responsible for infiltrating the anti-nuclear activist
group. The New England gentleman did not
swear the attorney to secrecy when telling him this; he was simply sharing an
open secret. He even gave the attorney
copies of the LEIU newsletter. Here’s
just one choice quote from the March, 2012 edition of the newsletter: “As we sit here 10 plus years since the
September 11th attack, I believe the one thing that we can agree on is that
intelligence and information-sharing opportunities have never before been this
prevalent” (Godsey 1).
Indeed. The LEIU uses carefully worded language on
its website to reveal to the initiated, with a wink and a nod, the true purpose
of the organization:
After 9/11/01 the demand for and
consumption of intelligence became a national priority. The National Criminal Intelligence Sharing
Plan endorsed the concept of an intelligence system which would allow
connectivity and sharing among local, state, tribal and federal authorities for
the purpose of effectively protecting the homeland. This Plan also endorsed the need to have
universal adoption of and adherence to certain proven rules for the collection,
maintenance, dissemination and purging of intelligence information. The rules endorsed, the Law Enforcement
Intelligence Unit Criminal Intelligence File Guidelines and Code of Federal
Regulations, Title 28, Part 23, have long been in use in local and state
jurisdictions.
One of the many advantages of these
two sets of rules is that they have been tested and have proven to strike an
appropriate balance between the legitimate needs of law enforcement and the
legitimate concerns of the civil liberties community. When properly followed they avoid situations
in which there are revelations of unnecessarily broad invasions of citizens’
privacy without a legitimate law enforcement purpose or the creation of
intelligence files without existence of a criminal predicate.
Study carefully that last sentence: “When properly followed they avoid situations
in which there are revelations of unnecessarily broad invasions of citizens'
privacy without a legitimate law enforcement purpose….” The sentence doesn’t say that the
organization refuses to engage in “unnecessarily broad invasions of citizens’
privacy.” It simply says that if the
LEIU’s time-tested methods are followed, “revelations” of such invasions will
be avoided. Again, the purloined letter
is right there for all to see, sitting on the mantelpiece, a glowing sign
attached to it that reads: SEE HOW VERY
CLEVER I AM.
Not only does the Law Enforcement Intelligence Units sell
their own line of specialized product (e.g., polo shorts, mugs, coins, lapel
pins, pencil caddies, paper weights, mouse pads, and shot glasses) for the LEIU
enthusiast, but more significantly they offer “training events” in major
metropolitan cities all across the United States to those willing to pay the
not-so-exorbitant fees in order to be initiated over the course of five days
into the mysteries of civilian law enforcement, i.e., vigilantism, i.e.,
gangstalking. Their last gala event was
held in Phoenix, Arizona from May 4th to the 8th,
2015. For only $650.00 you too could
have gained “access to all non-law enforcement sensitive training, refreshments,
and social events (including Banquet).”
Think about all the stories of police brutality that assail
us every year via the news. Think about
how common it is for trained
professionals with decades of experience
to overreach their authority and take upon themselves the role of judge,
jury and (more and more common these days) executioner. Now think about how much more common such
“incidents” will be when you give some wanna-be cop a week’s intensive
training, and then send that person out into the world under the auspices of a
“civilian” watchdog organization like the LEIU.
If you pause for a moment and think back to some of the most prominent
headlines of the past few years, I think you might come to a reasonable
conclusion: that we’ve already seen the
results of such vigilantism on a tragic scale that have made headlines around
the world.
Did George Zimmerman have some connection to the LEIU (or an
LEIU-type organization) before he decided to play Neighborhood Watchcop and
viciously murdered an innocent black teenager named Trayvon Martin on the night
of February 26, 2012 in Sanford, Florida?
If so, why haven’t we heard of any such connections? Because no investigative journalist has
bothered to look into the matter, because the issue of “gangstalking” is
completely off the radar of mainstream journalists. The total blackout of gangstalking is not at
all dissimilar to the way that the conspiracy known as “Watergate” was
completely off the radar of mainstream journalists when Mae Brussell (often referred
to by fans and critics alike as “the Queen of Conspiracies”) first wrote about
the cover-up in the pages of Paul Krassner’s The Realist, an alternative magazine that was mainly known for its
scathing satire, not for its serious investigative journalism. Similarly, when the growing government
corruption that surrounds the issue of gangstalking breaks in the mainstream
media at last, thousands of professional journalists will once again be
revealed as the barely competent cheerleaders-for-hire they really are.
When George Zimmerman was found
“not guilty” of Trayvon Martin’s murder on June 13, 2013, despite the
overwhelming evidence against him, the world community couldn’t believe
it. The day Zimmerman escaped his due
punishment, my friend Dion Fuller (the subject of Chameleo) sent me an email in which he wrote, “…in my very valuable
opinion, this ‘kid’ has the stink of the all new American Secret Police from
day one. He’s a gaslighting closet cop
who is obviously too nutty to make it as a real cop, but that didn’t stop the
new and improved crypto-control apparatus from exploiting that douche bag to
Hell and back.”
Obviously, Dion is speculating a
great deal here, so let’s pause a moment and assume that Zimmerman has no real
ties to the gangstalking community at all.
If so, this wouldn’t change the fact that Zimmerman is the perfect
poster boy for the type of drone drawn into the world of gangstalking. Motivated by a deadly combination of
far-rightwing politics and Christian outrage, these “perps” (as targeted
individuals often refer to these criminals) seem to exhibit all the signs of
being self-righteous control freaks who suffer from the overwhelming desire to
stick their noses into the lives of others, perhaps because they have none of
their own—just as Zimmerman decided, for no good reason, to insert himself into
the life of Trayvon Martin with the barrel of a 9mm pistol. The novelist William S. Burroughs once
pithily referred to these types as “basic shits”:
Most of the
trouble in the world has been caused by folks who can’t mind their own
business, because they have no business of their own to mind, any more than a smallpox
virus has. Now your virus is an obligate cellular parasite, and my
contention is that evil is quite literally a virus parasite occupying a certain
brain area which we may term the RIGHT center.
The mark of a basic shit is that he has to be right […].
This RIGHT virus
has been around for a long time, and perhaps its most devoted ally has been the
Christian Church: from the Inquisition to
the Conquistadores, from the American Indian Wars to Hiroshima, they are RIGHT
RIGHT RIGHT. (The Adding Machine 15-16)
Zimmerman is the classic example of
a Burroughsian basic shit. Now, let’s
speculate that such a shit is itching to become involved in law enforcement,
but is prevented from doing so due to the fact that, as my friend Dion so
eloquently put it, he’s “too nutty to make it as a real cop.” The answer to such previously unattainable
desires can now be satiated by giving the LEIU 650 bucks and a week of your
time. Assuming you survive the no doubt
rigorous standards of such training, you can now move on to become a member of
what is referred to as “a civilian intelligence community program,” i.e.,
people who specialize in spying, harassing, and collecting intelligence on
their neighbors. Keep in mind that this
eager new initiate into the exciting and shadowy world of “community
intelligence” isn’t exactly the brightest bulb in the batch. If he was, he’d already be on his way to
becoming a real cop and not a pretend one.
These people are not critical thinkers.
They tend to accept what they’re told.
If the organizer of the “civilian intelligence community program” tells
our new initiate that the young couple who live down the block are
anti-government terrorists with ties to al-Qaeda, or child pornographers, or
just plain old drug pushers who need to be watched 24/7, for the most part said
initiate will simply take this on faith and proceed to harass and spy on the young
couple in question. Here’s the ultimate
irony: Thinking they’re fighting rampant
terrorism and crime, they’re unknowingly engaging
in terrorism and crime. The way
these “civilian intelligence community programs” are organized is very similar
to the structure of a terrorist cell.
Terrorist cells are structured in
such a way that if one member is ever captured or interrogated, he can never
reveal any significant information about the organization because he was never
given such information in the first place.
In fact, he may not even know that
he’s part of the organization at all
or, if he does, the exact nature of his true function in that organization. The intelligence community has employed this
structure for years on classified projects.
The vast majority of the scientists employed by the Manhattan Project
didn’t know they had been working on an atom bomb until the day Hiroshima was
decimated. The big difference here is
that helping to develop the atom bomb was not unconstitutional. Gangstalking is.
It’s
very possible that some of the
low-level initiates into the “civilian intelligence community programs”
and/or
gangstalking programs are reading this very article. If so, you should
understand something: You are being duped into committing criminal,
unconstitutional acts for the benefit of manipulative authoritarians who
have
no interest whatsoever in the well-being of you or your country. This
illegal activity will be exposed. Just like Watergate, the cracks in
your
organizations will grow wider and wider.
And just like Watergate, the exposure will come from within. Consider
the strong possibility that there
are many people working within these organizations who are very unhappy
with
how this situation has devolved over the course of the past fifteen
years. What seemingly began as a way to protect the
United States from another devastating terrorist attack has now
transformed
into an all-out assault on innocent civilians who are arbitrarily
considered
“unworthy” to live a peaceful life—either because such people are deemed
to be
unruly agitators due to their political point of view, or simply because
they
were in the wrong place at the wrong time and had the misfortune of
getting
under the skin of some uptight bureaucrat who decided to exploit the
resources
of the black budget to “get even” with said individual.
There are some perps who are
literally being blackmailed into taking part in this illegal surveillance, and
these reluctant gangstalkers are turning against their masters in subtle,
covert ways. There are also high-level
architects who, growing more and more disgusted by what their beloved program
has become, are trying their damndest to cover their own asses when all of this
eventually blows up in the faces of the empty suits who signed off on this mass
surveillance program. Such survivalists
are no doubt slowly gathering evidence against their compatriots. Despite having similar religious and political
beliefs, the people in charge of this program do not trust each other at
all. Addiction to surveillance naturally
leads to more surveillance. The watchers
begin watching each other. Sooner or
later, no one can be trusted. As with the dictatorial “Leader” in Alan
Moore and David Lloyd’s classic dystopian graphic novel, V for Vendetta,
the role of Big Brother can be a very lonely and
paranoia-inducing one—particularly if you serve on an entire committee
of Big
Brothers, all of whom are vying for the top position. Such power plays
become untenable after a while. Again, all you have to do is look at
what
happened to Nixon’s White House. Or as
William Burroughs once said, “Control is controlled by its need to
control.”
To Be Continued In “A World of Stalking
Fools” Part Three (Coming Soon)….
No comments:
Post a Comment