[Part Three of this series can be found by clicking HERE.]
Despite the dire seriousness of the gangstalking phenomenon
(and if he had the ability to speak to us today, someone like Trayvon Martin
could probably attest to how serious this situation really is), the bungling,
Barney-Fife-quality of some of these perps can nonetheless be darkly amusing at
times.
Some of these amateurs, the ones they throw right into the
field with very little training, manage to make complete jackasses of
themselves. Recently, my friend Dion had
to drive from Humboldt to San
Francisco for a doctor’s appointment. Upon arriving in the city, he spotted a
gangstalker on his tail. After experiencing ten-plus years of implacable surveillance, it's not surprising that Dion can identify one of these perps almost at a glance. The telltale signs are unmistakable. The body language, shifty behavior, and relentless shadowing all combine to reveal the obvious. After all, the entire purpose of a gangstalker is to be noticed. They’re not spies. In fact, they’re the opposite of spies. Their
purpose is to do everything they can to get the target’s attention while
appearing to be harmless to everyone else around them. In this case, however, the gangstalker in
question apparently decided to bring his girlfriend along with him—perhaps to
show off his glamorous job as one of the new breed of Stasi police
officers? This perp was in his early
twenties and a bit of a bungler. Dion has had so much experience with these creeps, he could tell right from the start that this had to be the
kid’s first night on the job. So instead
of trying to resist the wave, he dove into it.
He decided to approach them. The perp seemed increasingly nervous as Dion
proceeded to hit on the perp’s girlfriend.
The girlfriend, also in her early twenties, seemed to like the attention
and broke the sacred rule of not interacting with the target. Eventually, the perp had to drag his
girlfriend away from Dion.
As they were walking down the street, the girlfriend giggled
and waved goodbye to Dion and whispered to her boyfriend, “He didn’t seem too bad.” Oh, not like the al-Qaeda terrorist and/or
child pornographer you had been told about?
Apparently, this perp’s girlfriend possessed more critical
thinking skills than all these other gangstalkers combined.
Case in point: How
easy it is for these surveillance organizations to indoctrinate the perps into
believing the very worst about a targeted individual is made clear by an
episode of What Would You Do?, a
hidden-camera-type TV show that regularly airs on Primetime, an ABC television news magazine. (You can see this particular segment on
YouTube under the title “Obedience To Authority--From A Stranger--TV Show ‘What Would You Do’”). The producers of the
show hired a private detective to stand outside a grocery store. An actress with a baby in a stroller is
walking along casually buying produce from an outdoor fruit stand. The detective approaches a random passerby,
flashes the person an official looking badge, then tells the person, “Hey, see
that woman over there with the baby in the stroller? That’s not her baby. She’s a kidnapper.”
“Oh, really?” says the incredulous passerby.
“Yes. Really. Now I need you to help me. I’m going to save the baby from that evil
witch. What I need you to do is distract
her—ask her the time, anything—while I sneak up behind her and grab the
kid. Can you do it for me?”
In a nation raised on cheap television melodramas, perhaps
it shouldn’t be surprising that every person the detective stopped was
perfectly willing to go along with what’s clearly
a kidnapping in process.
Each person did indeed stop the innocent looking mother and
distracted her while the rumpled detective grabbed the baby, hopped in a van,
and drove away! One guy even blocked the
mother’s progress like a football player blocking a pass while the actress
screamed, “Help! My baby! Help! Please!”
One woman looked extremely nervous when the surprise camera
crew jumped out of the bushes and started asking her questions like, “Excuse
me, ma’am, may I ask you a question? Why
did you choose to believe what that man told you?”
Realizing she had just helped a complete stranger steal a
woman’s child for no good reason at all, the woman looked extremely distressed
as she ignored their questions, leaped into her SUV, and peeled out of the
parking lot.
This is exactly the process used to lure perps into
gangstalking. These types not only
require no training whatsoever, they don’t even demand any pay. All you have to do is sound somewhat
authoritative, flash a shiny badge, and say, “See that guy over there? He’s a domestic terrorist. He’s been talking about blowing up
buildings. He’s a child molester. He’s a rapist.” In the 1950s, they would’ve accused him of being
a Communist. The label doesn’t
matter. It just has to sound somewhat
believable, and the innate vigilante in all of us will leap at the chance to
carry out some much-needed unofficial street justice.
The infatuation with the vigilante fantasy is very much
engrained in American pop culture. This
need for vengeance is integral to so many folkloric pulp characters throughout
the twentieth century and beyond, from Zorro to The Shadow to Batman to Dirty
Harry to Charles Bronson in Death Wish,
that the average person will jump at the chance to become a part of that
fantasy, even if the reality is the exact opposite of the fantasy. The obvious irony is that the people in the
above mentioned scenario thought they were preventing a kidnapping when, in
fact, they were helping to commit a
kidnapping. This mirrors how many of the
perps are convinced that they’re fighting against domestic terrorism (because
that’s what they’ve been told by the men with the shiny badges) when, in fact,
they’re helping to commit acts of domestic terrorism against innocent,
patriotic civilians.
This love of vigilantism recently played itself out within
the arena of a college classroom.
Consider Tom Roussey’s WJLA.com 3-26-14 article entitled “GMU Law Professor Pepper Sprayed During Lecture”:
Several charges are pending against
a man who walked into a classroom on George Mason University’s Arlington campus
and pepper sprayed a law professor.
The school says that on Wednesday
afternoon during a law and literature class in this fourth floor classroom, an
intruder entered. He jumped up on the
desk, announced that he was making a citizen’s arrest, and then pepper sprayed
Professor Tyler Cowen in the face.
Cowen ran into the hall, and the
intruder chased him until an off-duty officer who happened to be a student in
class caught him at one of the building’s exits and held him until police
arrived.
ABC7 was the only station there as
police took the suspect into custody.
Ironically, the school says Cowen
was teaching a unit on vigilantes—so some students may have initially thought
that the situation was fake.
“It just seems bizarre, because I
think of George Mason as a really safe campus,” said student Kristie Colorado.
12 to 15 people, including the
professor, were briefly treated by medics for breathing issues.
Students at George Mason’s
Arlington campus received an email about the attack hours after it happened.
“It's definitely very concerning
that someone can just come into a building and assault a professor like this,”
said student Shannon Orcutt.
The school says the professor was
not seriously hurt and refused to be taken to the hospital. Students were sent home for the day
“He’s a pretty big name in the
economics department,” said Colorado.
Cowen is an economist and author
and is one of the most well-known professors at George Mason.
It remains unclear as to why the
suspect did this; the school says he is not a student at the school, and his
name will be released after he appears before the magistrate and is officially
charged.
Let’s briefly reread one paragraph
in the article: “Ironically, the school
says Cowen was teaching a unit on vigilantes—so some students may have
initially thought that the situation was fake.”
Consider the possibility that this was not ironic at all—that it was the
entire reason for the attack. In our current culture, one must not lecture
about vigilantism or make a public stand against
it. After all, vigilantism is a very
ugly word for the noble new profession pursued by the George Zimmermans of the
world: the 21st century
profession of choice known as Surveillance Role Player, Super Patriot
Extraordinaire, Fulltime Gangstalker, or Halfass Nazi Stormtrooper. In this brave new world of ours, we can all
know what it’s like to be Batman and the Joker all rolled into one: We commit the crimes while solving them at
the same time. At this rate all crime
should be wiped out within a few generations.
Eventually, of course, there will be so many gangstalkers that there
will be no one left to stalk. I guess
they’ll have no choice but to stalk each
other at that point, but let’s worry about that when the time comes. For now let’s just enjoy the fun.
But what about those of us who don’t want to join in on the
fun? How do you resist these amateur
stormtroopers when they come creeping around your neighborhood?
Very often victims of gangstalking feel helpless and
alone. They can even doubt their own
sanity (the main objective of gangstalking).
The only reason they can’t trust their own senses is because they know
absolutely nothing about gangstalking, as no mainstream media outlet has
acknowledged the phenomenon, not even as urban legend. As H.P. Lovecraft once wrote, “The oldest and
strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear
is fear of the unknown” (12). Therefore,
getting the word out about the phenomenon—in any form necessary—should be the
targeted individual’s primary goal. Any
prior knowledge on the part of the target, no matter how meager, will help to
prevent the perps from using their gangstalking methods as a means of driving
innocent people insane. Eliminating that
major tool of the gangstalkers will go a long way in rendering their entire
operation completely useless.
In other words, the first helpful action you can take for
yourself is to know you’re not crazy. Once you’ve got that out of the way, you can
begin to fight back.
I suggest taking advantage of an excellent website called
fightgangstalking.com and studying in-depth the section entitled “Tactics for Fighting Back.” These down to earth,
prosaic methods are—for the most part—well within the capabilities of the
average person. It might be helpful if I
briefly highlight some of the best pushback tactics proposed by this site:
Targets
of organized stalking must wage a two-front war: we must act locally to expose the harassment
to neighbors and others, and we must expose what is happening on a national
level as well. Both objectives are critical […].
Targeted
individuals need to exploit asymmetrical warfare principles. As much as possible, we should employ tactics
which are unpredictable, creative, cheap, simple and bold. The worst thing a victim of organized
stalking could do would be to adopt a cautious defensive posture […].
Gang
stalking perps (including corrupt members of local law enforcement agencies)
will not want to attract attention to their gang stalking crimes by doing
battle with you in a public way, so they have to be very reserved in their
efforts to suppress your exposure of what is happening. You should exploit that […].
The author proceeds to offer
such tactics as purchasing counter-surveillance and security equipment. This requires some amount of money, of
course. If you don’t have enough funds
to do this, it’s not at all expensive to photograph and/or videotape the perps,
then post these photos and/or videos online.
Fightgangstalking.com advises:
Don’t
post photos in a way that could be considered libelous. For example, don’t write a caption which says
‘These are my stalkers.’ Instead, say
something like ‘Here are some people I have seen near my residence, where I’m
being gangstalked. Maybe one of these
people witnessed something that could be helpful.’
The most important tactic
involves the dissemination of the truth.
Distributing flyers, a time honored American tradition, costs very
little and is quite effective in dispersing cutting edge information among
those who should be made aware of what’s actually happening in their
neighborhood or their country or their world.
Even a highly trafficked website may never be encountered by the people
most in need of seeing it; however, a provocative flyer taped to one’s front
door cannot be overlooked or ignored.
You will accomplish multiple
objectives by distributing flyers: (a)
your neighbors will have some clue about what is happening—which could force
the local street-level perpetrators to limit their harassment somewhat, (b) the
local police will be forced to contend with some inconvenient questions from
citizens about what is happening, (c) the (non-cowardly) members of the news
media might investigate and report on it, and (d) such reporting could create
pressure for members of Congress to acknowledge the reality of organized
stalking—and perhaps initiate an investigation—as was done by the U.S. Senate’s
Church Committee during the 1970s regarding the FBI’s infamous Cointelpro
operations and the CIA’s Project MK Ultra.
Leaving aside other low cost
methods of transmitting information such as clever chalk messages scrawled on
sidewalks outside the residences of known gangstalkers, subversive bumper
stickers and business cards, and pithy self-inking stamps, one should never
forget the old-fashioned, direct approach:
[S]ending letters to your
representatives in Congress calling for an investigation into domestic
counterintelligence crimes is a smart thing to do, and it requires very little
time and effort. You should send your
letter (or email) to the member of the House of Representatives who represents
your congressional district, and to both of your state’s senators […]. Consider writing your letter in the form of a
question rather than an assertion. Although
you are in a position to be certain of the reality of gang stalking, the person
to whom you are writing does not have such first-hand experience, and cannot
know whether your claims are credible. So
instead of saying ‘this is happening and you should look into it,’ it might be
more productive to ask whether the person you are writing to has any knowledge
of the media reports about what appear to be domestic counterintelligence
operations, and suggesting that an investigation is in order.
And let’s not neglect to exploit the Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA) while it’s still in existence:
“FOIA requests can be used to (possibly) find information about your
personal situation—for example, whether you are under investigation or on a
watch list. It can also (possibly) be
used to find information about organized stalking generally.” I suggest using the key words “Surveillance
Role Players” or “Cultural Role Players” in your FOIA request in order to
narrow the possible results.
A much more in-depth examination of these pushback
techniques can be found by clicking HERE. Though I certainly encourage readers to visit
fightgangstalking.com, it’s also important to note that these are by no means
the only methods of self-defense available to a target of gangstalking. Other (far more esoteric) possibilities
follow in Part Five of this series.
When engaged in a battle—whether face-to-face or
otherwise—remember that it’s always best to turn your opponents’ perceived strengths into
weaknesses. For example, I once met a
man named Marc at a backyard barbeque in Venice,
CA who had been a member of the Church of Scientology for ten years. When Marc realized that the Church was
nothing more than a brainwashing cult and that he had been taken for a very
costly ride, he opted out of the organization; however, the Church of Scientology
does not take kindly to deserters, even less so than the U.S.
military. Church members proceeded to
stalk and harass Marc nonstop for weeks at a time. Fortunately for Marc, he had ten years worth
of high level Scientology training to use against them. He knew and understood their methods. The Church had spent an entire decade instilling
in Marc a very important idea: that
enemies of the truth were not to be tolerated, and that the best way to
eradicate the enemy was to use his own weapons against them. Using this method, L. Ron Hubbard and his
Church had performed successful counterintelligence programs against the
Internal Revenue Service for years and had gotten away with these crimes; they
had been attacking the field of American psychiatry for decades, ever since the
1950s, in the same way. (For evidence of this, I suggest reading Bent Corydon's well-researched book entitled L. Ron Hubbard: Messiah or Madman?)
My friend took Hubbard’s dictum to heart and used his
extensive knowledge of the Church’s harassment techniques against them all. He knew their standard operating procedure
would be to send one of their True Believers on a mission to trail Marc all
over town in order to off-balance him, intimidate him, and generally drive him
crazy-paranoid. Because he knew this,
Marc was able to get the jump on the Church and would begin each new day by tailing his tail before the intimidation
campaign could even get off the ground.
Eventually, the poor Church operatives got the hint and backed off. (Former Army intelligence officer Julianne
McKinney, who suffered through similar gangstalking tactics for years, has
related similar stories about successfully intimidating her harassers. I recommend listening to an illuminating radio
interview with McKinney,
which can be heard in its entirety on YouTube under the title “US Army Intelligence Officer: Gang Stalking Phenomenon is Precursor to Coming Holocaust.”)
Turning the tables on your enemies is always richly
satisfying, of course; however, this particular method of resistance might be
out of reach for some targeted individuals.
If so, it’s imperative to change the rules of the game to one’s own
advantage. Refuse to play on their board
where the rules are stacked against you.
Make your own rules instead. In
fact, make your own game board from scratch….
To Be Continued In “A World of Stalking
Fools” Part Five (Coming Soon)….
No comments:
Post a Comment