Most Americans haven’t seen what’s coming.
[Nancy] MacLean
notes that when the Kochs’ control of the GOP kicked into high gear
after the financial crisis of 2007-08, many were so stunned by the “shock-and-awe”
tactics of shutting down government, destroying labor unions, and
rolling back services that meet citizens’ basic necessities that few
realized that many leading the charge had been trained in economics at
Virginia institutions, especially George Mason University. Wasn’t it
just a new, particularly vicious wave of partisan politics?
It wasn’t. MacLean convincingly illustrates that it was something far more disturbing.
MacLean
is not the only scholar to sound the alarm that the country is
experiencing a hostile takeover that is well on its way to radically,
and perhaps permanently, altering the society. Peter Temin, former head
of the MIT economics department, INET grantee, and author of The Vanishing Middle Class, as well as economist Gordon Lafer of the University of Oregon and author of The One Percent Solution,
have provided eye-opening analyses of where America is headed and why.
MacLean adds another dimension to this dystopian big picture,
acquainting us with what has been overlooked in the capitalist right
wing’s playbook.
She
observes, for example, that many liberals have missed the point of
strategies like privatization. Efforts to “reform” public education and
Social Security are not just about a preference for the private sector
over the public sector, she argues. You can wrap your head around those,
even if you don’t agree. Instead, MacLean contends, the goal of these
strategies is to radically alter power relations, weakening pro-public
forces and enhancing the lobbying power and commitment of the
corporations that take over public services and resources, thus
advancing the plans to dismantle democracy and make way for a return to
oligarchy. The majority will be held captive so that the wealthy can
finally be free to do as they please, no matter how destructive.
MacLean
argues that despite the rhetoric of Virginia school acolytes, shrinking
big government is not really the point. The oligarchs require a
government with tremendous new powers so that they can bypass the will
of the people. This, as MacLean points out, requires greatly expanding
police powers “to control the resultant popular anger.” The spreading
use of pre-emption by GOP-controlled state legislatures to suppress
local progressive victories such as living wage ordinances is another
example of the right’s aggressive use of state power.
Could
these right-wing capitalists allow private companies to fill prisons
with helpless citizens—or, more profitable still, right-less
undocumented immigrants? They could, and have. Might they engineer a retirement crisis by moving Americans to inadequate 401(k)s? Done. Take away the rights of consumers and workers to bring grievances to court by making them sign forced arbitration agreements? Check. Gut public education to the point where ordinary people have such bleak prospects that they have no energy to fight back? Getting it done.
Would they even refuse children clean water? Actually, yes.
MacLean notes that in Flint, Michigan, Americans got a taste of what the emerging oligarchy will look like — it tastes like poisoned water. There, the Koch-funded Mackinac Center pushed for legislation that would allow the governor to take control of communities facing emergency and put unelected managers in charge. In Flint, one such manager switched the city’s water supply to a polluted river, but the Mackinac Center’s lobbyists ensured that the law was fortified by protections against lawsuits that poisoned inhabitants might bring. Tens of thousands of children were exposed to lead, a substance known to cause serious health problems including brain damage.
Tyler Cowen has provided an economic justification for this kind of brutality, stating that where it is difficult to get clean water, private companies should take over and make people pay for it. “This includes giving them the right to cut off people who don’t—or can’t—pay their bills,” the economist explains.
To many this sounds grotesquely inhumane, but it is a way of thinking that has deep roots in America.
To read the entire article, click HERE.
No comments:
Post a Comment